Brooks and, for that reason, we are evaluating other appellate remedies at this time,” Dash’s attorney, Natraj Bhushan, told us Monday morning. In particular, we think that this court should not have affirmed the speculative damages awarded to Ms. “We respectfully disagree with the Second Circuit’s summary order. Meanwhile, Dash will pursue other legal avenues in light of the decision. It’s time to move past this and for payment.” “I am glad that the Second Circuit was not fooled by the misinformation and misdirection Damon Dash offered them in the appeal. He stole my dream and took my ‘Mafietta’ brand as his own without consent or any credit to me, its creator,” said Brooks. ![]() “Damon Dash claims to help African-American women while stealing from me and my family. Brooks the $300,000 he owes her and close the chapter.”īrooks blasted Dash in a statement following her second victory. “At this point, four federal judges have told Mr. Brooks,” Brooks’ attorney, Chris Brown, said in a statement. “Damon Dash can no longer run from his scandalous and malicious treatment of E.W. Brooks sued Dash when their plans to turn her four-part “Mafietta” book series into a film hit a snag, according to documents obtained by Page Six.īrooks claimed that Dash marketed and sold the film about her female crime boss character without her consent - and the United States Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit agreed. The music mogul’s April 2020 appeal was found “without merit” last week, after writer E.W. I think it’s embarrassing,” he says to Sharpe.Judge temporarily blocks producer from selling Jay-Z album as NFTĭamon Dash must pay an author $300,000 for copyright infringement, a judge reaffirmed in a new ruling. “I would never sue somebody I used to hustle with - I’m not into suing anybody. Carter Enterprises LLC.”ĭash, who is asking for $1 million in damages, “is claiming unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty.” Because Dash was a co-owner of Roc-A-Fella Records, he also owns a portion of that work’s masters.Ĭarter’s lawsuit is regarding the use of the masters from “Reasonable Doubt” in various spaces, like the NFT market.ĭash filed a lawsuit because he believes that Jay-Z “has transferred streaming rights to Reasonable Doubt without authorization from Roc-A-Fella to S. Though Carter wrote and performed the album, giving him ownership of 50 percent of the composition, the masters are owned by the label. The two have been at odds about the ownership of Jay-Z’s 1996 debut album for years. He continued, “Then I just had to sue him because he was redirecting funds for ‘Reasonable Doubt’ I didn’t realize it.” “He sued me for something he said that I did that I didn’t,” Dash said. Still pushing, the Pro Football Hall of Famer wanted to know if a difference of opinion was the cause of their breakdown, and if so, “Why y’all can’t get in a room and just hug it out.”ĭash answered that they were “straight,” even though the pair are still in court over two matters. ![]() (Photo by Johnny Nunez/WireImage)ĭash quickly said, “We’re in court right now. Damon Dash and Jay-Z during The Launch of Jay Z’s 40/40 Club – Inside Party at 40/40 Sports Bar in New York City, New York, United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |